Matthias Clasen wrote: > On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 09:37 -0800, Karsten Wade wrote: >> On Tue, 2007-11-06 at 21:27 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote: >> >>> Can't we all please stop the alarmist tone, and just try codeina once, >>> before continuing this discussion ? I am surprised how much of this >>> discussion seems to be based on hearsay or reading reviews. >> Another piece of hearsay: >> >> http://fedora-tutorials.com/2007/11/07/pow-codec-buddy/ >> >> The sequence shown in that post has no Board-approved dialog pop-up. It >> seems to be the standard codeina -- pop a dialog that gives the option >> to get some non-free codecs, then walk the user through a purchasing >> situation. >> >> Is that review based on an old version? > > Unfortunately, I discovered last night after sending my last mail that > we forgot to add a dependency to the codeina package when we put in > nottings rewording patch that added the link to the fedora wiki. The > side effect of that is that the distro dialog ("the sermon") is skipped > unless you happen to have python-sexy installed. > I can also confirm this, with two 'sexy' packages, it works as intended. Vladimir > This could be what you are seeing in the above walk through. This is > really unfortunate (and makes me look bad in this discussion). I have > built a fix and pushed it as a zero-day update. > > > Matthias > > _______________________________________________ > fedora-advisory-board mailing list > fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx > http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
