On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 14:04 -0500, Christopher Blizzard wrote: > seth vidal wrote: > > If that's the case then we should just give up on this quixotic goal of > > having a pure-free-software distro and start talking to companies for > > how they'd like us to provide their closed-source packages and how to > > tie a webstore frontend into yum. > > yumgate! woo! > > In all seriousness I don't think that there are a lot of instances where > we would be willing to do something like what we've done in this case. > I'm happy with inconsistency, as long we're transparent about it. > > In this case it's just because there's no other legal way to do it. We > can't even ship the free versions because of patent concerns. > This is what I'm looking for here. I'd like to be able to say something that kinda-sorta makes sense for reasons to say no to money from some vendor to put an ad for their software in the distro. -sv _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
