Re: codec buddy pain

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 2007-11-04 at 15:14 -0500, seth vidal wrote:
> http://lwn.net/Articles/256974/
> 
> Btw - in the interview they mention further integration of the webstore
> into codeina/codecbuddy. If it starts looking like we're pushing closed
> source software then that, imo, is when codeina gets dumped out of the
> distribution.

Agreed; we should not be shipping a shill.

> I don't care about needles and I don't want to ween the addicts off.

People who build their houses on the top of the hill so the addicts in
the valley don't steal from them are just delaying the inevitable.

We can remove ourselves from the problem entirely, but it doesn't make
the problem go away, and it doesn't stop it from growing larger (again)
to engulf us.

I feel we've been sticking our heads in the sand long enough.  Even if
CodecBuddy falls flat on its face, at least it falls forward and causes
some movement.

- Karsten
-- 
Karsten Wade, Developer Community Mgr.
Dev Fu : http://developer.redhatmagazine.com
Fedora : http://quaid.fedorapeople.org
gpg key : AD0E0C41

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux