Karsten Wade wrote: > On Tue, 2007-11-06 at 21:27 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote: > >> Can't we all please stop the alarmist tone, and just try codeina once, >> before continuing this discussion ? I am surprised how much of this >> discussion seems to be based on hearsay or reading reviews. > > Another piece of hearsay: > > http://fedora-tutorials.com/2007/11/07/pow-codec-buddy/ > > The sequence shown in that post has no Board-approved dialog pop-up. It > seems to be the standard codeina -- pop a dialog that gives the option > to get some non-free codecs, then walk the user through a purchasing > situation. > > Is that review based on an old version? Screenshots on that page are the actual sequence on install from DVD.i386.iso Internode [Au] mirror still has pub/fedora/linux/releases/8/ open, this is where I got iso image from. It looks like a final release but I have no meanings of confirming this, other than the clues from the installed system: - pirut is picking up updates from updates, not rawhide repo. - test 3 worked properly (with FAB approved pop-up). Tree for 7.92 shows version codeina-0.10.1-1 and the one I currently have (from iso) is codeina-0.10.1-5 - /etc/fedora-release is Fedora release 8 (Werewolf) Vladimir > > I won't go into all the things that disturb me if that is an accurate > review based on current packages; I'll do as you ask, and wait to find > out. > > - Karsten > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > fedora-advisory-board mailing list > fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx > http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
