Re: codec buddy pain

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2007-11-06 at 09:51 -0800, Karsten Wade wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 16:21 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> 
> > No, this is not correct. We entirely control the initial dialog that
> > explains the situation (what has been dubbed "the sermon" in early
> > reviews) and contains the link to the fedora wiki, and we have changed
> > the wording of that dialog in the run-up to F8, based on feedback from
> > people from this list. 
> 
> This is what I understood was happening.
> 
> If it is an advertisement, or has the workflow that Seth posted[1], or
> has any how-to-buy-directly stuff still, that is a 'RED ALERT' condition
> and needs to be fixed as a zero-day update.  We would also need some
> marketing/pr-type correction out there as well.

Can't we all please stop the alarmist tone, and just try codeina once,
before continuing this discussion ? I am surprised how much of this
discussion seems to be based on hearsay or reading reviews.

_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux