On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 16:21 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote: > No, this is not correct. We entirely control the initial dialog that > explains the situation (what has been dubbed "the sermon" in early > reviews) and contains the link to the fedora wiki, and we have changed > the wording of that dialog in the run-up to F8, based on feedback from > people from this list. This is what I understood was happening. If it is an advertisement, or has the workflow that Seth posted[1], or has any how-to-buy-directly stuff still, that is a 'RED ALERT' condition and needs to be fixed as a zero-day update. We would also need some marketing/pr-type correction out there as well. - Karsten [1] http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-advisory-board/2007-November/msg00036.html -- Karsten Wade, Developer Community Mgr. Dev Fu : http://developer.redhatmagazine.com Fedora : http://quaid.fedorapeople.org gpg key : AD0E0C41
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
