On Mon, 5 Nov 2007, seth vidal wrote:
That's what codeina has done - but it's brought something else into
relief. We have this software in the distro now that a big portion of is
providing a window for advertisements for closed-source codecs from
another company.
That's the precedent that concerns me.
So which is the worse scenario?
1. Providing no support at all to MP3 users?
2. Encouraging MP3 users to break the law?
3. Pointing MP3 users to a legal solution that privileges a particular
vendor -- with the possibility of including other vendors later?
There are no easy answers here. If there we're, we'd have solved the
problem by now.
--g
--
Greg DeKoenigsberg
Community Development Manager
Red Hat, Inc. :: 1-919-754-4255
"To whomsoever much hath been given...
...from him much shall be asked"
_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
