On Thu, 2006-08-24 at 01:53 +0530, Rahul wrote: > seth vidal wrote: > > >>> what do y'all think? > >> +1. Wouldnt reviving rpm.org be better than finding another place though? > >> > >> > > > > rpm.org is on red hat servers. > > > > neutral, to me, means an exec at any one company can't order it taken > > offline. :) > > > > Ok. I dont think thats really a big issue. I havent heard anyone ever > accused Red Hat of controlling GNOME just because gnome.org is hosted by > Red Hat (on probably the same server as rpm.org even). If thats really a > concern,move rpm.org hosting to some other place then instead of > creating a new project place. > > My point is rpm.org is the natural place most people are going to look > when filing bugs, looking to discuss spec issues, documentation etc. > fair enough. some minor items: linux.duke.edu has cvs repos and bugzilla already running if it is any use to anyone. so then 'upstream' rpm would actually have an upstream place to do that stuff. -sv _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
