Re: JBJ considered harmfull

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tuesday 08 August 2006 10:12, Max Spevack wrote:
> I was hoping it would be done by now, and that it wouldn't be a long wait.
>   The purpose of what Bill and Will were talking about doing was stopping
> non-Fedora maintainers or QA folks, basically, from closing Fedora bugs,
> which is a major problem with what JBJ is doing.

This doesn't prevent him from leaving abusive comments in our bug reports.  
This is IMHO the bigger issue.  Do we have a method for removing abusive 
folks from bugzilla?  If I were to go start dropping f-bombs on random bugs, 
how quickly would my account get disabled?  Why is jbj any different?

-- 
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora

Attachment: pgpAElQroIOsl.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list
fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux