Re: JBJ considered harmfull

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jesse Keating wrote:
On Tuesday 08 August 2006 10:12, Max Spevack wrote:
I was hoping it would be done by now, and that it wouldn't be a long wait.
  The purpose of what Bill and Will were talking about doing was stopping
non-Fedora maintainers or QA folks, basically, from closing Fedora bugs,
which is a major problem with what JBJ is doing.

This doesn't prevent him from leaving abusive comments in our bug reports. This is IMHO the bigger issue. Do we have a method for removing abusive folks from bugzilla? If I were to go start dropping f-bombs on random bugs, how quickly would my account get disabled? Why is jbj any different?

Well, for starters, I'd imagine it a lot easier and justifiable for redhat/fedora to censure someone @redhat.com. (:

-- Rex

_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board

_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list
fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux