On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, Christopher Blizzard wrote: > Do we really want to wait that long? I was hoping it would be done by now, and that it wouldn't be a long wait. The purpose of what Bill and Will were talking about doing was stopping non-Fedora maintainers or QA folks, basically, from closing Fedora bugs, which is a major problem with what JBJ is doing. >From an engineering perspective, is that going to take a long time? --Max > Max Spevack wrote: > > On Mon, 7 Aug 2006, Rex Dieter wrote: > > > > > Jesse Keating wrote: > > > > Yet another case of JBJ being offensive: > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=143301 Can we > > > > please revoke his access to Fedora bugs? > > > > Wow, those comments... > > > > > I think(*) the consensus (of the Board) was that this would likely > > > happen, but only after another "upstream" bugzilla (besides > > > bugzilla.redhat.com) was established for rpm. > > > > > > -- Rex > > > > > > (*) Hopefully I'm not putting words in others' mouths, please speak up > > > otherwise. (: > > > > That's accurate. notting and wwoods were going to do some work on solving > > the issue of bug groups, etc. > > > > Where are we with that? > > > > --Max > > > > > _______________________________________________ > fedora-advisory-board mailing list > fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx > http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board > > -- Max Spevack + http://spevack.org + gpg key -- http://spevack.org/max.asc + fingerprint -- CD52 5E72 369B B00D 9E9A 773E 2FDB CB46 5A17 CF21 _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
