seth vidal wrote:
what do y'all think?
+1. Wouldnt reviving rpm.org be better than finding another place though?
rpm.org is on red hat servers.
neutral, to me, means an exec at any one company can't order it taken
offline. :)
Ok. I dont think thats really a big issue. I havent heard anyone ever
accused Red Hat of controlling GNOME just because gnome.org is hosted by
Red Hat (on probably the same server as rpm.org even). If thats really a
concern,move rpm.org hosting to some other place then instead of
creating a new project place.
My point is rpm.org is the natural place most people are going to look
when filing bugs, looking to discuss spec issues, documentation etc.
Rahul
_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list
fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
