On Tue, 2006-08-22 at 22:52 -0400, seth vidal wrote: > On Tue, 2006-08-22 at 21:35 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > > On Tue, 2006-08-08 at 13:10 -0400, Greg DeKoenigsberg wrote: > > > > > > We will continue to deal with these unpleasant issues until we have the > > > courage to resolve them. > > > > Hate to revive this, but it's getting press now. LWN has a subscribers > > only link here: > > > > http://lwn.net/Articles/196523/ > > > > IMHO, a public announcement about the direction Fedora is going to go in > > regards to RPM should be made soon. > > > > <sigh> so much fun. > > There's a meeting taking place either this or next week about internal > issues at rh about rpm. > > We talked about it briefly at the last board meeting. > > lwn will bring a lot of heat and light, not much energy, sadly. > > I wonder who suggested this article topic to corbet? > my response to the whole article: http://lwn.net/Articles/196593/ _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
