Re: JBJ considered harmfull

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 22 Aug 2006, seth vidal wrote:

my response to the whole article:

http://lwn.net/Articles/196593/

Good response, Seth.

Yes, there is a meeting up in Westford next week with stakeholders throughout Red Hat engineering and Fedora who will be there. In particular, Jeremy and Bill will be at the meeting, and they are both 100% capable of discussing RPM from the Fedora perspective.

So there will be more on this topic next week, but that said, I'm glad that f-a-b is asking for updates and demanding action.

--Max

--
Max Spevack
+ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MaxSpevack
+ gpg key -- http://spevack.org/max.asc
+ fingerprint -- CD52 5E72 369B B00D 9E9A 773E 2FDB CB46 5A17 CF21

_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board

_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list
fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux