Re: dealing with rpm.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2006-08-24 at 01:44 +0530, Rahul wrote:
> seth vidal wrote:
> 
> > Some thoughts on Goals for rpm:
> > 
> > The goals for rpm are kinda obvious in the general sense to me:
> >   - regular releases
> >   - development goals/roadmap
> >   - definition of parts
> >   - opening up development a bit more.
> >   - straightening out the bits we think need straightening. (tbd :)
> > 
> > Another point to hit:
> >  - the rpm 'trademark issue'  - Peter and I both had some zany ideas on
> > this, actually. (lpm, anyone? :)
> > 
> >  
> >  
> > anyway - that is most of what I'm going on right now.
> > 
> > what do y'all think?
> 
> +1. Wouldnt reviving rpm.org be better than finding another place though?
> 
> 

rpm.org is on red hat servers.

neutral, to me, means an exec at any one company can't order it taken
offline. :)

-sv


_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board

_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list
fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux