Re: Rollback issue: a proposal

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,


OKUMURA Shinji wrote:
Gonzalo,

comment inline.

If re-INVITE rejected, I think, it doesn't influence the remote
target.
see the reference to RFC 3261 in the draft regarding atomicity.

               A                 B
INVITE/200/ACK <----------------->
  Contact: A1
reINVITE/18x   <----------------->
  Contact: A2
UPDATE/200     <----------------->
  Contact: A3
4xx/ACK        <----------------->

You say that A's Contact(local target) is rolled back to A1.
Is this right?

yes.

Therefore, I think that "removing the precondition" is not allowed.
Is this wrong?

the precondition phase is over. The preconditions were already met. All you are doing is indicating that the stream is in use in the most backwards compatible way we have.

Cheers,

Gonzalo


Regards,
Shinji

_______________________________________________
Sipping mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping
This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP
Use sip-implementors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for questions on current sip
Use sip@xxxxxxxx for new developments of core SIP

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Announce]     [IETF Discussion]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Big List of Linux Books]

  Powered by Linux