On Wed, 2004-12-15 at 07:54 -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > note how the list of dependencies doesn't include just other rpms. > it specifically includes *individual* *files*, with no regard to where > they came from (at least, as i read it). in short, even a stock > standard, unmodified fedora core rpm-based system *already* > incorporates non-rpm information in its own install process. ergo, > your point is irrelevant. Can we drop this until you learn how rpm dependancies work. You don't require rpms, you require things that rpms provide - such as files, libraries or perl modules. -- [ Nigel Metheringham Nigel.Metheringham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ] [ - Comments in this message are my own and not ITO opinion/policy - ] _______________________________________________ Rpm-list mailing list Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list
