Re: The end of RHL for private use?

To: shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: The end of RHL for private use?
From: John Haxby <jch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 13:40:22 +0100
In-reply-to: <H000006600004317.1064525331.fluffy.thehaxbys.plus.com@MHS>
References: <sf716687.008@CRPORGCTNW02-IA> <200309240950.45528.hosting@j2solutions.net><H0000066000041ba.1064433943.fluffy.thehaxbys.plus.com@MHS><3F71FB02.9030900@thehaxbys.co.uk> <Pine.LNX.4.53.0309241551160.15762@antares.mpcu.com> <64503.65.41.55.192.1064443550.squirrel@whooper.org> <H000006600004317.1064525331.fluffy.thehaxbys.plus.com@MHS>
Reply-to: shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Sender: shrike-list-admin@xxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030703

Keith Morse wrote:

I should know better by now. This is one of the reasons I generally lurk, too many stupid things get typed by myself. sigh.

Actually, I think you're one of the more sane contributors.

jch


--
Shrike-list mailing list
Shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/shrike-list

References:
- Re: The end of RHL for private use? [was: Fedora vs. RHL]
  - From: Brian T. Brunner
- Re: The end of RHL for private use? [was: Fedora vs. RHL]
  - From: Jesse Keating
- Re: The end of RHL for private use? [was: Fedora vs. RHL]
  - From: John Haxby
- Re: The end of RHL for private use? [was: Fedora vs. RHL]
  - From: Keith Morse
- Re: The end of RHL for private use?
  - From: William Hooper