Keith Morse wrote: > > On Wed, 24 Sep 2003, John Haxby wrote: > > I may be wrong, but didn't I read somewhere that RHEL *sources* > > would be freely available for download (by which I understood src > > rpms) which means that it wouldn't be beyond someone, a lot of > > people in fact, to maintain a binary version of RHEL built from > > source. > > They are, at least on any of the ftp/rsync mirrors I've seen so far. > Maybe even a bigger question are errata (update) rpms. So far all > I've seen/heard is that the RHEL subscription provides for a > quarterly update cd. And I haven't seen these in srpm form yet. Which is why I didn't consider this an option, plus the fact that my management doesn't like "selfmade" software. Furthermore, I would feel like cheating if I did... It's not RHEL what I want or need, it's good old RHL as it has been until 7.3... Best regards, Martin Stricker -- Homepage: http://www.martin-stricker.de/ Linux Migration Project: http://www.linux-migration.org/ Red Hat Linux 8.0 for low memory: http://www.rule-project.org/ Registered Linux user #210635: http://counter.li.org/ -- Shrike-list mailing list Shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/shrike-list
