Hi Joe, On Sun, 2003-08-17 at 17:05, Joe wrote: > >Sorry I don't understand "fully transparent to the OS" > > > Meaning the raid hardware just makes it look like a normal drive to the OS - Yes, Running DOS - cd\C: or cd\D: works Running Win2K - Drive-C and Drive-D both are visible > > >I have tried to install RH9.0 after having installed Win2K. It asked > >where to install RH9.0, hda or hdc. There was not hdb therefore I > >hesitate to proceed. > > > So rh sees a primary disk on the primary controller, and a primary disk > on the secondar controller - but not a secondary disk on the primary > controller, are you sure you have such a setup? Yes. There are 2 slots on the Controller and each drive is connected to each one slot separately. Do you mean hda and hdc representing each drive? Why hdb is missing? > I would do a sanity check and proceed through the install to the point > where you are selecting the disk partition scheme, and look to see where > rh says your windows partition is - the install procedure won't actually > change anything on your disk until accept the partition changes, you can > cancel them out if you see something that doesn't make sense. Noted with thanks After selecting "Automatically partition" and click "Next" following page popup 1. Remove all Linux partitions on this system 2. Remove all partitions on this system 3. keep all partitions and use existing free space (already checked automatically) hda 378173 MB Maxtor (already checked automatically) hdc 378173 MB Maxtor - Review (and modify if needed) the partition created I check point-1 above as well as last point (Review (and modify if needed) the partition created) (Remark: the capacity of each drive is 40G) Furthermore can I use RH9.0 CD#1 to check the drives after booting up. If YES, how to do it? Thanks in advance. B.R. Stephen Got an I Care HK! Idea? Go to http://www.iCareHK.com/iCarehk/index.html to Submit. -- Shrike-list mailing list Shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/shrike-list
