Re: reiser4 inclusion?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dear Arend,
Jason Todd Slack-Moehrle wrote:
So I forked. OntoLab too.
Where is you fork, and where is the fork from OntoLab? The reiser4
patches on http://www.ontolinux.com/technology/ontofs.htm are identical
to the patches from Eduard
1. I declared that it is not really a fork in the normal sense. I would call it a further development. 2. I started mirroring the code to support the development of the filesystem and to give it a webpage, which others can count on. This was done before the code was put into kernel.org space. 3. I do repeat now again: We're running in circles since 2 or 3 years. I also said to this kind of questions in this thread, that we aren't at this point actually. That means, we still have not got an open source (developer) community conform answer by responsible persons. 4. I hold my code back until the actual maintainer declares what he really is doing, is gone, or I have build up an own infrastructure with a mailing-list and other needed items. The latter will be what is called a fork and follow the advice of the actual maintainer (quote: "Go away").
Cheers,

Arend
Best regards
Christian *<:o)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe reiserfs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux File System Development]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Ext4 Filesystem]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux