Re: reiser4 inclusion?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Volker Armin Hemmann schrieb:
On Samstag 25 April 2009, you wrote:
Dear Volker Armin,

On Samstag 25 April 2009, Jason Todd Slack-Moehrle wrote:
Edward,

Please,
don't flood in this mailing list.
Go away!
You are totally out of line here.

First, please following mailing list etiquette and don't top post
it is pretty much his mailing list.
And what?

his mailing list his rules.
Ah, really? Every day, there is something new to learn.
Also it is very impolite attacking people on their own ml for breaking netiquette. Oh wait - it is impolite to attack people on mailing lists for breaking netiquette - that is a break of it.
???
Second, Christian, like all others, have a right to post here. You may
not agree with his posts (or what he is doing with OntoFS), but that
does not give you the right to tell him to go away.
yes, it does. Just look at the archives.
Ah, what?

Third, if the community only relied on you to progress reiserfs, it
has been years at this point and nothing significant. it is basically
somewhat dead.
reiserfs is in  maintenance mode - there aren't much changes. In fact,
less changes is a good thing.

Edward is also pretty much the last person working on reiser4. You are
attacking him, but I don't see patches from you. Gives someone something
to think about.
Yes, but not in the sense you want us to direct to.

hm, what do you want people to think? When was the last time ontolabs sent patches to lkml for review or mm inclusion? Attacking Edward on the ml for being stubborn or not working enough doesn't make you look good at all. Especially if he just acked a couple of patches a few days ago and uploaded a patch for 2.6.29 shortly after its release.
Sorry, but once again You haven't caught the real problem.

look at the archives. Edward has good reasons to feel ripped of.
Maybe it is all a big miscommunication. But that isn't solved when
ontolabs guys agressively advertise for themselves.
It is no agressive advertisment by us. It is standard communication in
an open source mailing list.

from my POV it looks like agressive advertisement. If it is not intended that way, structure and wording needs a lot of improvement.
Luckily you are not the owner of the mailing-list

Regards
C. Stroetmann
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe reiserfs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux File System Development]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Ext4 Filesystem]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux