Re: Performance question, RAID5

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 31 January 2011 08:52, Keld JÃrn Simonsen <keld@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> If your intallation is CPU bound, and you are
> using an Atom N270 processor or the like, well some ideas:
>
> The Atom CPU may have threading, so you could run 2 RAIDs
> which then probably would run in each thread.
> It would cost you 1 more disk if you run 2 RAID5's
> so you get 8 TB payload out of your 12 GB total (6 drives of 2 TB each).
>
> Another way to get better performance could be to use less
> CPU-intensitive RAID types. RAID5 is intensitive as it needs to
> calculate XOR information all the time. Maybe a mirrored
> raid type like RAID10,f2 would give you less CPU usage,
> and the run 2 RAIDS to have it running in both hyperthreads.
> Here you would then only get 6 TB payload of your 12 GB disks,
> but then also probably a faster system.
>
> Best regards
> keld
>

Hi,

It's interesting what you say about the XOR calculations. I thought
that it was only calculated on writes? The Atom (330) has HT, so Linux
sees 4 logical CPUs.

// Mathias
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux