Re: Performance question, RAID5

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 30 January 2011 04:44, Roman Mamedov <rm@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 00:18:34 +0000
> Mathias BurÃn <mathias.buren@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> I ran the benchmark found on the page (except for writes); results:
>
> That's kinda unfortunate, as stripe_cache_size only (or mostly) affects writes.
>
> --
> With respect,
> Roman
>

Right, it's just that I don't want to destroy my data. I've ran a few
bonnie++ benchmarks with different mount options though. You can find
them here: http://stuff.dyndns.org/logs/bonnie_results.html
It actually looks like stripe=384 helped performance a bit. Currently
retrying the same mount options but with 32MB stripe cache instead of
8MB.

Then you have all the readahead settings as well, like:

blockdev --setra 8192 /dev/sd[abcdefgh]
blockdev --setra 65536 /dev/md0

And disabling NCQ;

for i in sdb sdc sdd sde sdf sdg; do echo 1 >
/sys/block/"$i"/device/queue_depth; done

I'll try those settings later.

// Mathias
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux