Re: Performance question, RAID5

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Mathias Burén put forth on 1/30/2011 1:41 PM:

> Thanks. New results up for those interested:
> http://stuff.dyndns.org/logs/bonnie_results.html

Three things I notice:

1.  You're CPU bound across the board, for all the tests that matter anyway
2.  Because of this, your performance spread is less than 5% across the board
    meaning any optimizations are useless
3.  Is that a 7 Gigabyte chunk size?  That's totally unrealistic.  It should be
    less than 1 MB for almost all workloads.

According to those numbers, you can swap SATA controllers and PCIe bus slot
assignments all day long, but you'll gain nothing without a faster CPU.

Why are you using a 7 Gigabyte chunk size?  And if the other OP was correct
about the 768MB stripe cache, that's totally unrealistic as well.  And in real
world use, you don't want a high readahead setting.  It just wastes buffer cache
memory for no gain (except maybe in some synthetic benchmarks).

-- 
Stan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux