On 20 Aug 2013, at 22:00, Ashley Sheridan <ash@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 2013-08-20 at 21:44 +0100, Stuart Dallas wrote: >> On 20 Aug 2013, at 21:30, Dan Munro <dan@xxxxxxxxxxxx >> > wrote: >> >> >> in my opinion, that would be like asking "how big is the internet?". >> > >> > >> http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-switch/wp/2013/08/18/heres-what-you-find-when-you-scan-the-entire-internet-in-an-hour/ >> >> >> That's scanning IP addresses and doesn't come close to answering "how big is the internet," assuming that means how many sites are there rather than how many publicly responsive edge servers exist. >> > I'd argue that a large proportion of really secure servers out there won't respond to a lot of what Zmap pings out. Nmap works by throwing out requests on a bunch of different ports, not just ping, which is slow, so I'd be surprised if Zmap could really rival that while giving the same results. Bearing in mind there are over 4,000 million (I won't say billion, because that's a million million, despite what the Americans say!) IPv4 address out there, 40 minutes is a ridiculous amount of time to even scan half of that, especially given the fact that IPv6 is being majorly pushed because IPv4 is apparently running out of free address space! Then not forgetting that lots of websites exist on the same IP address/range, I would say the article is lacking on so many details as to be untrue. I wouldn't go so far as to say it's untrue, but it's certainly written with exaggerated implications. -Stuart -- Stuart Dallas 3ft9 Ltd http://3ft9.com/ -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
