At 12:44 PM +0200 6/16/06, Barry wrote:
>tedd schrieb:
>>At 1:44 AM -0400 6/16/06, Chris Shiflett wrote:
>>>Richard Lynch wrote:
>>>>It is possible that all "modern" browsers have given
>>>>in to whichever johnny-come-lately 'standard' made
>>>>up the Content-disposition header.
>>>The original RFC for it is dated June 1995, so it's not too recent. There are plenty of useful aspects of HTTP not defined in RFC 2616.
>>>
>>>>Content-type: application/octet-stream
>>>There's no reason you can't use both.
>>>
>>>Chris
>>
>>Chris:
>>
>>Barry says you can use these three:
>>
>>header("Content-Type: application/force-download");
>>header("Content-Type: application/octet-stream");
>>header("Content-Type: application/download");
>>
>>Richard says only use this one:
>>
>>header("Content-type: application/octet-stream");
>>
>>And, you say use both. Which both?
>>
>>tedd
>>
>Either my three or the one richard mentioned.
>
>Both are ok!
>
>:)
>
>Barry
Ahaaa, those four both.
I get it, thanks.
tedd
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://sperling.com http://ancientstones.com http://earthstones.com
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
