Re: Re: File Download Headers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



tedd schrieb:
At 1:44 AM -0400 6/16/06, Chris Shiflett wrote:
Richard Lynch wrote:
It is possible that all "modern" browsers have given
in to whichever johnny-come-lately 'standard' made
up the Content-disposition header.
The original RFC for it is dated June 1995, so it's not too recent. There are plenty of useful aspects of HTTP not defined in RFC 2616.

Content-type: application/octet-stream
There's no reason you can't use both.

Chris

Chris:

Barry says you can use these three:

header("Content-Type: application/force-download");
header("Content-Type: application/octet-stream");
header("Content-Type: application/download");

Richard says only use this one:

header("Content-type: application/octet-stream");

And, you say use both.  Which both?

tedd

Either my three or the one richard mentioned.

Both are ok!

:)

Barry
--
Smileys rule (cX.x)C --o(^_^o)
Dance for me! ^(^_^)o (o^_^)o o(^_^)^ o(^_^o)

--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php


[Index of Archives]     [PHP Home]     [Apache Users]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Install]     [PHP Classes]     [Pear]     [Postgresql]     [Postgresql PHP]     [PHP on Windows]     [PHP Database Programming]     [PHP SOAP]

  Powered by Linux