tedd schrieb:
At 1:44 AM -0400 6/16/06, Chris Shiflett wrote:
Richard Lynch wrote:
It is possible that all "modern" browsers have given
in to whichever johnny-come-lately 'standard' made
up the Content-disposition header.
The original RFC for it is dated June 1995, so it's not too recent. There are plenty of useful aspects of HTTP not defined in RFC 2616.
Content-type: application/octet-stream
There's no reason you can't use both.
Chris
Chris:
Barry says you can use these three:
header("Content-Type: application/force-download");
header("Content-Type: application/octet-stream");
header("Content-Type: application/download");
Richard says only use this one:
header("Content-type: application/octet-stream");
And, you say use both. Which both?
tedd
Either my three or the one richard mentioned.
Both are ok!
:)
Barry
--
Smileys rule (cX.x)C --o(^_^o)
Dance for me! ^(^_^)o (o^_^)o o(^_^)^ o(^_^o)
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
