I have now officially GIVEN UP on this thread.
On Fri, June 16, 2006 6:03 am, tedd wrote:
> At 12:44 PM +0200 6/16/06, Barry wrote:
>>tedd schrieb:
>>>At 1:44 AM -0400 6/16/06, Chris Shiflett wrote:
>>>>Richard Lynch wrote:
>>>>>It is possible that all "modern" browsers have given
>>>>>in to whichever johnny-come-lately 'standard' made
>>>>>up the Content-disposition header.
>>>>The original RFC for it is dated June 1995, so it's not too recent.
>>>> There are plenty of useful aspects of HTTP not defined in RFC 2616.
>>>>
>>>>>Content-type: application/octet-stream
>>>>There's no reason you can't use both.
>>>>
>>>>Chris
>>>
>>>Chris:
>>>
>>>Barry says you can use these three:
>>>
>>>header("Content-Type: application/force-download");
>>>header("Content-Type: application/octet-stream");
>>>header("Content-Type: application/download");
>>>
>>>Richard says only use this one:
>>>
>>>header("Content-type: application/octet-stream");
>>>
>>>And, you say use both. Which both?
>>>
>>>tedd
>>>
>>Either my three or the one richard mentioned.
>>
>>Both are ok!
>>
>>:)
>>
>>Barry
>
>
> Ahaaa, those four both.
>
> I get it, thanks.
>
> tedd
> --
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> http://sperling.com http://ancientstones.com http://earthstones.com
>
> --
> PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>
--
Like Music?
http://l-i-e.com/artists.htm
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
