I thought in 2010 we are so over this and be who we want to be without having to make any excuses to anyone.
That's true liberation.
Renate
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 9:10 AM, Emily L. Ferguson <elf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
At 9:36 AM -0400 5/10/10, John Palcewski wrote:
Let's consider how people would have reacted had the caption been
different from:
"Yep...I just keep on churnin' out them thar purdy pictures! "
This is like a masculine wink and a nudge in a strip club. Dude!
It's just a bunch of "purdy" gals without their clothes on! Hardy,
har, HAR.
The costume, the look, is above anything else SEXUAL.
Why claim otherwise?
And that is, indeed, the question.
I have no issue with Russ shooting this sort of stuff, although philosophically and socially I have big issues with the stuff. But the real problem for me is that Russ appears to not understand what the market is that he's meeting. It's even OK with me if he likes shooting this stuff, but I find it really sad that he doesn't emit even the tiniest sense that many on the forum are dismayed that he isn't interested in finding a less troubling way of making a living.
Sure, one can shoot and get paid well for shooting dog fights, but where does ones ethical sense come in.
--
Emily L. Ferguson
mailto:elf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
508-563-6822
New England landscapes, wooden boats and races
http://www.landsedgephoto.com
http://e-and-s.instaproofs.com/
