"Censors"? "Thought police are fired up"? No need for getting angry; this is a forum and agreements can be put forward as to what should be excluded. Based on the agreements, people can choose to join or not. I'm sure everyone agrees that there must be some limits; if some want no limits then they can choose to not join. -yoram
On Apr 11, 2010, at 7:34 AM, John Palcewski wrote: Every time you raise the camera and capture a human being, clothed or otherwise, it's an exploitation of sorts. Sell the picture, and you are exploiting the subject. Even if you've already paid her to be a model. Gratuitious? I see the censors and thought police are fired up and on an other self-right
Everything THEY do is perfectly OK. It's all the others who need to be stopped. And right NOW. Lighten up. If you don't like the image, don't look at it.
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 7:22 AM, YGelmanPhoto <ygelmanphoto@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: Staying on the topic: it's not frontal nudity per se, rather it's gratuitous frontal nudity and which in this image seems to be exploited. -yoram
|
