Re: Canon digital bodies and Nikon lenses.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



----- Original Message -----
From: "Emily L. Ferguson" <elf@xxxxxxxx>
To: "List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals - Students"
<photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2005 1:01 AM
Subject: Re: Canon digital bodies and Nikon lenses.


: Never made contrast masks.  Only been in that toxic color darkroom
: for 4 hours of my 62 years.  Think I'll stay out of it for the rest
: of my years, too!


my 20" RA4 is in mothballs at the moment until I build the newer, bigger
darkroom, but once it's done I'll be back to RA4 in a shot!

Sure the processor takes up a lot of room and eats a bit of power, but
comparing the costs of ink to chemicals, the processing chemicals are FAR
cheaper.

As I've said before there were students at college who moved from digi and
inkjets back to RA4 as they found it so much faster to get a *good* print
out and the results looked so much better than any inkjet.


I also found when working in a large photo supply shop that a fair number
of B&W shooters were moving back into their darkrooms to get the tones,
longevity and speed of a silver based print.  Seriously -  seeing the grins
on faces regarding speed and ease was a laugh


myself, I'll keep the A3 8 colour inkjet for mucking around and for graphic
applications (have you ever made a poster with film based technology?? -
all that letraset stuff drives you nuts!) and the prints will come out of
the chemical baths :-)


k





[Index of Archives] [Share Photos] [Epson Inkjet] [Scanner List] [Gimp Users] [Gimp for Windows]

  Powered by Linux