In theory I would agree with you, and it's the reason I post the occasional photo here (I think I've posted only about two photos in the past 5 years, now I remember why) except that in practice it's always the same few people who comment, and if it happens to be a nude, they won't like it. So from a market research angle, it doesn't always work. I know how you feel about nudes and rocks, at least I get them to pose in uncomfortable positions to add some freshness to the genre! ;-) -dan c. At 03:05 PM 29-08-05 -0700, Jeff Spirer wrote: > >Several years back I came to the realization that, regardless of what >I thought about the photo, the comments here were useful as market >research, giving the perspective of people other than me and my >immediate circle. That doesn't mean I have to agree, but it does >mean I can find out what types of people like and don't like my work. > >I have a pretty good handle on that now - I've found that my >photographs appeal to specific age, sexual orientation, and location >characteristics. > >As for the photo, my big problem with it is that I have never >understood the nudes and rocks thing. >
