Why is that? What on earth is wrong with the pose? Is there something showing that shouldn't be that I missed? Or perhaps I should have posed her standing up, with one leg slightly bent at the knee, and also slightly crossing over the other leg, while she has both hand raised holding the back of her head, which is tilted back with her eyes closed, in high heels? The beautiful nude in nature? And popped her with an on-camera flash, because she is such a pretty girl and why hide it? Is there a figure photography rule book that I should check out? Is my photo even an example of figure photography? What IS "figure photography"? By the way, have you ever noticed how utterly boring traditional figure photography has become? thanks! :) -dan c. At 02:18 PM 27-08-05 -0700, SteveS wrote: > >Dan > >Such a pretty girl. You have a great opportunity to make good pictures. >This pose is one of the DO NOT DO in the realm of figure photography. >Sorry, it's awful for a great sense of light. >
