Re: PF Galleries on 29 JAN 05

Terry <terry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> · Tue, 01 Feb 2005 17:46:29 -0700

Exactly, my point is that why should it be a problem to convert digital to 
black and white just because of the ease, since color negs have been printed 
in black and white for quite some time.

Terry M

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "David Dyer-Bennet" <dd-b@xxxxxxxx>

To: "List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals - Students" 
<photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2005 2:55 PM

Subject: Re: PF Galleries on 29 JAN 05

Terry <terry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

One more thought on "Cheating" before I switched to digital I had some
of my portrait work printed on Panalure plus paper which as I
understand it is designed just for printing color negatives as black
and white photos, so it has been done for quite some time now.

I've printed a number of things on Panalure, though none recently

(haven't had a darkroom recently).  It's main niche was for newspaper

prints of portraits, during the time when most commercial portraits

were shot in color but many newspapers weren't using color photos all

the way back to the engagement announcements and such.

--

David Dyer-Bennet, <mailto:dd-b@xxxxxxxx>, <http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b/>

RKBA: <http://noguns-nomoney.com/> <http://www.dd-b.net/carry/>

Pics: <http://dd-b.lighthunters.net/> 
<http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b/SnapshotAlbum/>

Dragaera/Steven Brust: <http://dragaera.info/>