On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 1:55 PM, Kalle Valo <kalle.valo@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > "ext Aniello Del Sorbo" <anidel@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> About the "always", I too suggest it should be there. > > My point was that the meaning of the word "always" is not precise. It > would be a lot better if the bug report says "always, tested two > times". That way I can know that the bug might need to be tested quite > a few times before seeing it. > >> For example bug #3304 can be always reproduced. No matter what >> software you've installed or if it a fresh install. > > Of course there are bugs which have probability of 100%, I guess most > of the bugs are like that. But there are also tricky bugs which have, > for example, a probability of 10% and that's why it's important to know > how many times the reporter has tested it. > > This is the reason why I prefer always to use M/N notation. But this > is a minor issue, we shouldn't waste too much time on this. > Yup. It's clear what you mean. I support the notation then. -- anidel _______________________________________________ maemo-users mailing list maemo-users@xxxxxxxxx https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users
