On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 09:38 -0500, Ward, David - 0663 - MITLL wrote: > On 09/02/11 01:30, Dan Williams wrote: > > On Sat, 2011-02-05 at 22:40 -0800, Kyle Williams wrote: > > > I'm just throwing in my 2 cents here. > > > > > > > > > I'm using Ubuntu 10.10 server with the latest 1.5.1 driver and all > > the > > > latest tools. > > > I could not get a connection in Dallas, TX (last week), and after > > > coming home to Portland, OR it worked just fine. Nothing changed > > on > > > my box. > > > > > > > > > So I'm also at the belief that something is very specific to the > > > market. If we could find out what exactly (I believe it's an Auth > > > issue of some type) that would be great. > > > > > > > > > I'll be in NY on Monday-Friday, so I'll be testing this while I'm > > > there and will have more results. > > > > So far I've had success in both Minneapolis and Philadelphia, but > > failure in Boston. Windows worked fine in Boston. I sent logs to > > Inaky, but unfortunately the logs we can get from wimaxd don't have > > the > > right detail to diagnose the issue, and I wasn't around Boston long > > enough to dig further with him. > > > > > > I can obtain logs in Boston, if I can find out what you need... it > worked in Atlanta so my setup is fine. My signal strength is > "Excellent" in Porter Square. Just let me know. It was more of an issue of some tools that aren't available except under NDA, and since RH and Intel have existing NDAs in place for other stuff, I was covered and thus could use the tools. But I didn't find that out until too late... Might be able to enhance the existing logs to print out the right info though, not sure. Inaky might have more ideas on how to fix up the network service and/or driver to print out the required information. Dan > David > > > Clear works great in Harvard and Kendall, FWIW. > > > > Dan > > > > > > > > > > - Kyle > > > > > > On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 9:58 PM, Ward, David - 0663 - MITLL > > > <david.ward at ll.mit.edu> wrote: > > > On 01/20/2011 04:40 PM, Dan Williams wrote: > > > > I'm also having issues in Boston now under Linux, but > > works > > > > fine under > > > > Windows. The same HW/SW config was working yesterday in > > > > Minneapolis, so > > > > it's not the hardware/software, but something in wimaxd > > > > probably. I've > > > > sent logs to Inaky so we'll see what he can dig up. > > > > > > > > Dan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Inaky, > > > > > > I was in Atlanta earlier this week, and suddenly I was > > able to > > > connect to CLEAR under both Fedora 14 32-bit and 64-bit. > > So > > > the problem in the Linux driver does seem to be localized > > to > > > the deployment in Boston. > > > > > > Can someone from CLEAR determine if there is a different > > base > > > station model, frequency, etc. used in Boston, to assist > > with > > > the efforts debugging this? Are there more debugging logs > > > that I can provide you? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > David > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > wimax mailing list > > > wimax at linuxwimax.org > > > http://lists.linuxwimax.org/listinfo/wimax > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
