Re: the push to get rid of CONFIG_VT in the kernel and the future of Speakup

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I use an initramfs, and I have speakup built in, but indeed, I do get
messages pretty early, certainly before the real root is alive -- things
are fine as long as the kernel boots up, if that were not to happen,
then I would be sunk without something in the kernel itwself.

Chris Brannon <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> "John G. Heim" <jheim@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > Yeah, if you're a linux sysadmin, hardware speech is not some luxury
> > you can do without.
> 
> Well, if the Linux console moves into user space, this doesn't have mean the
> end of hardware speech.
> Perhaps the way forward is through initramfs?  As a proof of concept, I
> built one that had the Speakup modules, audio libraries, and espeakup.
> I had *software* speech running from the initramfs.
> It was a bit difficult to build it, because I had to figure out all of
> the dependencies and add them.  But it worked.
> Now, if you're just doing hardware speech, things are going to be much
> less complicated, and it should definitely be possible to have it long
> before the root partition is mounted, even if the Linux console code
> ends up migrating to userspace.
> 
> -- Chris
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://linux-speakup.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/speakup

-- 
Your life is like a penny.  You're going to lose it.  The question is:
How do
you spend it?

         John Covici
         covici@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
Speakup mailing list
Speakup@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://linux-speakup.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/speakup





[Index of Archives]     [Linux for the Blind]     [Fedora Discussioin]     [Linux Kernel]     [Yosemite News]     [Big List of Linux Books]
  Powered by Linux