Huh? Not having a choice doesn't mean it's not a reduction in access.
That logic makes no sense what so ever. I mean, you could argue that we
are stuck with it but that doesn't mean it won't hurt.
On 10/08/14 16:26, Deedra Waters wrote:
I dont see it as a reduction in access in all i mean i guess there is to
some degree but the reality is that this change in the end reguardless
of wether it comes in systemd or some other form is they're going to end
up moving the console out of the kernel if they do this, well, you wont
have working speech to begin with so how is it a reduction in access if
we have no choice in the matter?
_______________________________________________
Speakup mailing list
Speakup@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://linux-speakup.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/speakup
