On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 12:11:40AM +1030, Jonathan Woithe wrote: > On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 01:24:19PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote: > > > With regard to the ioctl, should this be an implementation of the ioctl > > > provided by the old out-of-tree driver, or is there an established > > > standard/example which I should write against instead? > > > > We have a standard (if possibly needing a few bits adding) ioctl for > > basic RS422/485 features. That's TIOCG/SRS485 (which for all the naming > > is also kind of 422 and other related bits as well) > > Ok, thanks for the pointer. I'll take a look at this in due course. > > > Can we get a Signed-off-by: for the first patch so we can try and get it > > into 3.8 ? > > Sure. See below. The rest of the previous commit message was fine so I > haven't replicated it here. Please do, otherwise I have to hand-edit the patch to add it back, and odds are, I will get it wrong... thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-serial" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
