On 10/11/2018 2:50 PM, Hefty, Sean wrote: >> I think there were 2 issues: >> 1. number of endpoints supported was limited to 4 >> 2. using port guid rather than/in addition to node guid and port >> number >> in acm address config file >> >> I can see how #1 can be changed without user visible change but not >> sure >> if/what you had in mind for #2. > > The issue that was reported is that the node guid is the same for all VFs. I'm assuming that the port guid per VF differs in this case. Yes, port GUID is unique per VF in both the original shared port virtualization as well as the newer virtual port model. -- Hal > - Sean >
