Re: RFC: ibacm endpoints

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/10/2018 3:53 PM, Hefty, Sean wrote:
>> Thanks Sean. Should I then the remove the port number from the triple,
>> or keep it for legacy reasons?
>>
>> Hal's concern about backward compatibility vs. the address file, does
>> that need to be addresses in your opinion?
> 
> I would maintain compatibility, maybe you can use the number of inputs to decide between port versus node guid. 

Yes, that's what I was thinking in terms of backward compatibility.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux