RE: RFC: ibacm endpoints

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> >>> In Oracle, we have some tests where we enable 16 VFs on an HCA
> (actually, any number), and use these VFs in a bare-metal fashion,
> i.e., we have 34 IPoIB devices and no VMs.
> >>>
> >>> In this case, the above ibacm limitation hits us. This because we
> will have 17 IP addresses associated with the triple Node GUID, Port
> #, and pkey. The Node GUID is the very same for all the VFs.
> >>>
> >>> Would it make better sense for ibacm to use the tuple Port GUID
> and pkey to designate and endpoint instead?
> 
> Well, just chatted with Bjørn Dag (BD) here. He mentioned that the
> reason for choosing the Node GUID could be suport for APM. Is that so?

No, APM wasn't a consideration.  I think port guid would work okay.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux