RE: RFC: ibacm endpoints

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Thanks Sean. Should I then the remove the port number from the triple,
> or keep it for legacy reasons?
> 
> Hal's concern about backward compatibility vs. the address file, does
> that need to be addresses in your opinion?

I would maintain compatibility, maybe you can use the number of inputs to decide between port versus node guid. 




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux