On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 05:16:28PM -0400, Hal Rosenstock wrote: > On 10/10/2018 3:53 PM, Hefty, Sean wrote: > >> Thanks Sean. Should I then the remove the port number from the triple, > >> or keep it for legacy reasons? > >> > >> Hal's concern about backward compatibility vs. the address file, does > >> that need to be addresses in your opinion? > > > > I would maintain compatibility, maybe you can use the number of inputs to decide between port versus node guid. > > Yes, that's what I was thinking in terms of backward compatibility. Why not increase or remove the internal limit instead of making any user visible change? Jason
