RE: RFC: ibacm endpoints

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> I think there were 2 issues:
> 1. number of endpoints supported was limited to 4
> 2. using port guid rather than/in addition to node guid and port
> number
> in acm address config file
> 
> I can see how #1 can be changed without user visible change but not
> sure
> if/what you had in mind for #2.

The issue that was reported is that the node guid is the same for all VFs.  I'm assuming that the port guid per VF differs in this case.

- Sean




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux