On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 11:54:53PM +0900, Paul Mundt wrote: > On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 07:06:24AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: > > By 1-3 I was referring to the first three patches of > > [PATCH 0/4] [rfc v3] mmc, ARM: Add zboot from eSD support for SuperH Mobile ARM > > > > That is: > > [PATCH 1/4] mmc: tmio_mmc: Move some defines into a shared header > > [PATCH 2/4] mmc, ARM: Rename SuperH Mobile ARM zboot helpers > > [PATCH 3/4] mmc: Add MMC_PROGRESS_* > > > > And by patch 4 I was referring to > > [PATCH 4/4 v5] mmc, ARM: Add zboot from eSD support for SuperH Mobile > > > > I apologise for that being as clear as mud. > > > Ok, that makes a bit more sense, thanks for clearing it up. > > > Magnus raised a build issue with the series since my previous email. > > I will investigate that and reply to him ASAP. Its probably best > > to hold all the patches until then. > > > It looks like 1/4 is going to have to go through the MMC tree, and will > have to layer on top of Guennadi's current patch stack. He's done a good > job of summarizing the outstanding bits, so it should be trivial to build > on top of that. > > Once 1/4 is merged I can easily merge 2 and 3/4 at pretty much any time > during the -rc window, although I'd prefer to have it sorted out by -rc2 > or -rc3 at the latest. This will just leave 4/4 for rmk's patch tracker > and its respective scheduling. > > For now I'll punt the series from patchwork and await a resend with 1/4 > rebased in such a way that it can trivially be picked up by the MMC tree. Understood. I'll rebase my work on top of Guennadi's current patch stack and repost. I also have some updates to patches 3 and 4 to resolve build issues that Magnus alerted me to. So I'll include them in my re-post as well. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
