On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 12:38:10PM +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > Hi Chris, Ian > > AFAICS there are currently still a few tmio patch-series outstanding: > > From: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski <at> gmx.de> > Subject: [PATCH 0/2] tmio_mmc: improve DMA reliability > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.mmc/6485 > > From: Simon Horman <horms <at> verge.net.au> > Subject: [PATCH 0/4] [rfc v3] mmc, ARM: Add zboot from eSD support for SuperH Mobile ARM > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.mmc/6664 IMHO, Patch 1-3 are ready and can either be merged through the MMC or one of Paul's trees. Although I should note that patches 2 and 3 include changes to arch/arm/boot/compressed/mmcif-sh7372.c and arch/sh/boot/romimage/mmcif-sh7724.c. Please wait on 4, which depends on 1-3, and I would like to do one more round of testing. In any case it'll most likely need to go through RMK's tree. > From: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski <at> gmx.de> > Subject: [PATCH 0/6] mmc: split the tmio driver into several modules > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.sh.devel/10304 > > From: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski <at> gmx.de> > Subject: [PATCH 0/4 v2] mmc: tmio: don't access nonexisting registers > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.sh.devel/10311 > > From: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski <at> gmx.de> > Subject: [PATCH/RFC 0/2 v2] mmc: tmio: power management and clock gating > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.mmc/6627 > > Of those the first patchset shouldn't have any issues. > > I haven't followed discussions regarding the second patchset from Simon - > is it going to be applied as is, or is a new revision required? I do not currently have any plans to revise patches 1-3. > If it is going to be applied, shall I rebase my remaining patches on top > of it or would you prefer Simon to rebase his patches (I think, he has > only one patch, touching tmio: [PATCH 1/4])? 1-3 include MMC changes but only patch 1 includes TMIO changes. I am happy for either my patches to go in first or for me to re-base them on top of yours. I'm also happy for you to re-base my patches (1 or 1-3) and include them in a patchset if that works for you. > As for the rest of the > patches, IIRC, the only remaining issue, that I'll be fixing today is > Magnus' wish to allocate the bounce buffer dynamically. Although, I could > imagine doing that incrementally, because the #ifdef, that Magnus would > like to get rid of is already now in the code, it is not introduced by > these my patches. But I can redo my patches too, no problem. > > What would be the preferred approach? > > Thanks > Guennadi > > On Tue, 15 Mar 2011, Ian Molton wrote: > > > Sounds like a good idea... Its possible that I could implement DMA on > > the toshiba stuff too, can your code handle this? > > > > (I havent had time to read this yet) > > > > -- > > Ian Molton > > Linux, Automotive, and other hacking: > > http://www.mnementh.co.uk/ > > > > > > > > On 11 March 2011 07:51, Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@xxxxxx> wrote: > > > Hi all > > > > > > The tmio_mmc SD/SDIO driver is serving very different hardware > > > configurations: on the one hand multi-function style chips from Toshiba, > > > Compaq, on the other hand SDHI units in ARM- and SuperH-based sh-mobile > > > SoCs. Apart from the different native APIs: MFD for the former and > > > platform-device in the latter, sh-mobile implementations also have a > > > number of features, exclusive to them, which, if implemented in the common > > > driver, clutter it needlessly and make its maintenance more difficult. > > > This patch series simplifies the situation by splitting the driver up into > > > 3 modules: the core, consisting of the main part and, on sh-mobile, of the > > > DMA part; the mfd glue; and the platform glue. This way also (imaginary) > > > sh-mobile systems with additional tmio mfd chips on them can be supported. > > > > > > Thanks > > > Guennadi > > > --- > > > Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D. > > > Freelance Open-Source Software Developer > > > http://www.open-technology.de/ > > > > > > > --- > Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D. > Freelance Open-Source Software Developer > http://www.open-technology.de/ > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sh" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
