On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 02:31:31PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: > On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 12:38:10PM +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > > Hi Chris, Ian > > > > AFAICS there are currently still a few tmio patch-series outstanding: > > > > From: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski <at> gmx.de> > > Subject: [PATCH 0/2] tmio_mmc: improve DMA reliability > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.mmc/6485 > > > > From: Simon Horman <horms <at> verge.net.au> > > Subject: [PATCH 0/4] [rfc v3] mmc, ARM: Add zboot from eSD support for SuperH Mobile ARM > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.mmc/6664 > > IMHO, Patch 1-3 are ready and can either be merged through the MMC > or one of Paul's trees. Although I should note that patches > 2 and 3 include changes to arch/arm/boot/compressed/mmcif-sh7372.c and > arch/sh/boot/romimage/mmcif-sh7724.c. > I'm having a hard time working out what these arbitrary 1-3 numbers map to in terms of actual series and patch numbers. As far as things with an sh or rmobile impact I see: sh: ecovec: use the CONFIG_MMC_TMIO symbols instead of MFD and [rfc v3] mmc, ARM: Add zboot from eSD support for SuperH Mobile ARM although it's not obvious how the latter is tied to a TMIO dependency (some SDHI header thing?). I'm happy to take the ecovec patch whenever, since it doesn't really hurt anything. Anything touching drivers/mmc I obviously prefer to go via Chris. I got buried in the fbdev patch queue today, so I'll be catching up on sh and rmobile stuff tomorrow. You're free to work out amongst yourselves what gets applied where in which order, or I'll simply guess. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
