On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 07:06:24AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: > By 1-3 I was referring to the first three patches of > [PATCH 0/4] [rfc v3] mmc, ARM: Add zboot from eSD support for SuperH Mobile ARM > > That is: > [PATCH 1/4] mmc: tmio_mmc: Move some defines into a shared header > [PATCH 2/4] mmc, ARM: Rename SuperH Mobile ARM zboot helpers > [PATCH 3/4] mmc: Add MMC_PROGRESS_* > > And by patch 4 I was referring to > [PATCH 4/4 v5] mmc, ARM: Add zboot from eSD support for SuperH Mobile > > I apologise for that being as clear as mud. > Ok, that makes a bit more sense, thanks for clearing it up. > Magnus raised a build issue with the series since my previous email. > I will investigate that and reply to him ASAP. Its probably best > to hold all the patches until then. > It looks like 1/4 is going to have to go through the MMC tree, and will have to layer on top of Guennadi's current patch stack. He's done a good job of summarizing the outstanding bits, so it should be trivial to build on top of that. Once 1/4 is merged I can easily merge 2 and 3/4 at pretty much any time during the -rc window, although I'd prefer to have it sorted out by -rc2 or -rc3 at the latest. This will just leave 4/4 for rmk's patch tracker and its respective scheduling. For now I'll punt the series from patchwork and await a resend with 1/4 rebased in such a way that it can trivially be picked up by the MMC tree. > With regards to > [PATCH 2/6] sh: ecovec: use the CONFIG_MMC_TMIO symbols instead of MFD > it looks like Magnus raised a few issues and Guennadi is going to repost > the patch. But I could be wrong. > Yes, already dealt with separately. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
